drupal stats
Search for in
  Contact Us  
Printable Version
PRS™-PROBES FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Topics: General / Technical / Logistical / Ordering / Past Research

Why does ion activity need to be accounted for when measuring soil nutrient bioavailability?

A principal factor controlling plant nutrient uptake is the relative activity (i.e., effective concentration) of nutrient ions in the soil solution. When assessing soil nutrient dynamics using the PRS™-probes, specific ion activities will influence the extent to which nutrient ions are adsorbed. Conversely, a conventional soil extraction only measures the total extractable ‘available’ nutrient pool, which depending on soil conditions may not be necessarily bioavailable. A PRS™-probe measurement, therefore, may be poorly correlated with a traditional soil extraction, but strongly correlated with plant nutrient uptake. This especially is true when the relative abundance of a single cation is skewed, which often is the case with Ca2+ in highly calcareous soils. High Ca2+ concentrations in the soil will reduce the activity of other ions of lower concentration, such as NH4+ and K+; therefore, the plant takes up greater amounts of the more highly concentrated ion and induces a deficiency in the other. Similarly with the PRS™-probes, excess Ca2+ affects the adsorption of NH4+ and K+ from the soil. Herein lies another example of why difficulties exist when attempting to compare the PRS™-probe data to conventional extraction techniques, measuring total extractable ion concentration instead of 'bioavailable' ions.

To illustrate the importance of measuring ion activity instead of total extractable levels, look at K+ bioavailability in a highly calcareous soil. The PRS™-probe K+ supply rates represent the flux of K+ from the soil to a plant root under conditions specific to the plant root environment, while chemical extractions are used as an index of the exchangeable K+ in the soil. Although there may be an abundance of NH4OAc-extractable K+, the excess Ca2+ in soil solution interferes with plant K+ uptake resulting in low K+ bioavailability to plant roots. It is not surprising then that fields with soils having abundant K+ (i.e., >1000 kg K/ha; NH4OAc-extractable), although considered to be K-deficient using the PRS™-probes, have exhibited significant crop growth response to added fertilizer K. This principle is illustrated in the figure below comparing PRS™-probe K+ supply rates to NH4OAc-extractable K (a) and extractable K percentage (b).



Initially, there is a poor correlation between PRS™-probe K+ supply rates and NH4OAc-extractable K (a); however, when expressed as extractable-K percentage (i.e., ratio of extractable K to the sum of extractable Ca, K, and Mg), there is an excellent correlation (b). Similarly with a plant root, the PRS™-probe nutrient supply rate measurement is influenced by the relative ion activities of nutrient ions in soil. By adsorbing only active ions, the PRS™-probe provides a functionally effective simulation of the process occurring at the plant root surface. As a result, PRS™-probe nutrient supply rates better reflect nutrient bioavailability to plants than a chemical extraction, particularly when soil type differences lead to changing buffer power and/or specific ion activities.

© 2007 Western Ag Innovations Inc. All rights reserved.   Privacy Policy.